The idea of reshoring, bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., has gained serious political and business traction over the past decade. From national security concerns to supply chain resilience and job creation, the motivations are clear. But is reshoring happening, or is it mostly wishful thinking?
According to the Reshoring Initiative, U.S. companies announced more than 350,000 new reshored jobs in 2022, a record high and a 25% increase over 2021. While this suggests strong momentum, implementation is not always as successful. Many companies run into challenges like a lack of skilled labor, gaps in domestic supply chains, and high startup costs. A 2023 Deloitte study found that only 35% of companies that announced reshoring initiatives in the previous five years met their job creation targets.
Still, there are clear success stories. GE Appliances reengineered products and processes to facilitate onshore production. By leveraging Industry 4.0 tools, they reduced production cycle times by 20% and lowered defects by 15%. Intel is investing over $40 billion in new fabs in Arizona and Ohio, with backing from the CHIPS Act. Their goal: to secure semiconductor supply chains and reduce reliance on Asia, where over 75% of chips are currently manufactured.
One key trend is the shift from pure reshoring to “smart reshoring.” Instead of blanket relocation, firms are bringing high-value or high-risk segments of their supply chains back home while automating to offset higher labor costs. Robotics and AI allow U.S. manufacturers to compete not on cheap labor, but on speed, quality, and innovation. The IFR reports that North America installed over 40,000 new industrial robots in 2023, a 12% increase year over year.
One of the critical enablers of successful reshoring is workforce readiness. The Manufacturing Institute reports that 77% of manufacturers face ongoing challenges in attracting and retaining workers with the right skills. Investment in vocational education, apprenticeships, and fast-track certifications will be essential to ensure that reshored operations are fully staffed and productive.
Environmental and energy considerations also factor in. Domestic manufacturing can reduce emissions associated with transcontinental shipping, especially if powered by clean energy. Some states, like Ohio and Georgia, are now positioning themselves as reshoring hubs by offering low-cost renewable energy, streamlined permitting, and logistics infrastructure built for rapid response.
Ultimately, reshoring is not about reversing globalization; it’s about recalibrating supply chains for flexibility, security, and speed. It’s about identifying what must be local and what can remain global and designing operations accordingly. The winners in this space are taking a holistic, data-driven approach to balancing cost with resilience.
The reshoring debate is no longer theoretical. It’s operational. And it’s time for U.S. manufacturing to step up and deliver.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Podbean
YouTube